Article 25, which authorizes the Town Administrator or School Superintendent to award certain contracts for terms exceeding three years, was approved after a significant debate regarding contract lengths and oversight. Proponents argued the change provides the town with more bargaining power and better long-term value in a competitive vendor environment.

Resident J. Pvich expressed concern about locking the town into long-term commitments in a volatile market, proposing an amendment to cap contracts at five years. Town Counsel B. Galvin clarified that all municipal contracts are subject to annual appropriation, meaning if the town cannot afford a contract in its third year, it can be terminated. Pvich's amendment failed, but a separate amendment from a resident named Lauren was approved, changing the requirement for School Committee approval from a fixed number of four members to a simple majority.

S. Darcy of the Select Board noted that the flexibility would allow boards to pursue better value. A. Senate supported the article from a procurement perspective, stating it would help with budget projections. The final motion, as amended, passed with a majority show of hands.

Motion: To authorize contracts for terms exceeding three years as amended.

Vote: Passed